SoClean CPAP Cleaning Device Lawsuit Claims False Statements

A lawsuit alleges that SoClean CPAP cleaners were sold to consumers with misleading and false information about their safety. This led them to buy the devices without realizing they were exposing themselves to high levels of potentially harmful ozone gas.

Chris Odom filed the lawsuit (PDF) earlier in the month at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. He sought class action status to pursue claims for himself and other SoClean CPAP cleaners’ purchasers.

SoClean is a safe and effective way to sterilize and disinfect CPAP machines. This product is used by people with sleep apnea. SoClean does not use enough ozone gas to clean CPAP machines. This could pose serious health problems for users.

SOCLEAN DEVICE LAWSUIT

Have you or a loved one suffered from respiratory problems or other issues that could have been caused by a SoClean CPAP cleaner device?

Odom claims that SoClean’s manufacturers failed to warn him or other consumers that it used ozone gas. This is a result of intentionally misleading marketing statements that called the ozone emitted from the machines “activated oxygen.”

SoClean 2 CPAP Sanitizing Machine, SoClean 2 Go CPAP Sanitizing Machine and their predecessors have been misleadingly marketed by SoClean. Odom’s lawsuit claims that the SoClean devices use ozone to sterilize and disinfect CPAP machines. Ozone must be in a concentration that is safe for animals and people to use as a germicide.

Odom points out that SoClean has aired thousands of commercials in different media markets over the years, claiming its devices use “no harsh chemicals” since it began marketing them in 2018. Odom points out that SoClean has aired commercials thousands of times in different media markets claiming its devices use “no harsh chemicals” since it first began marketing the devices in 2018.

The company was also accused of lying about SoClean’s devices being closed-loop systems that prevent “activated oxygen” from escaping. This is contrary to what the lawsuit alleges. Although a closed-loop system shouldn’t allow ozone to escape, SoClean circulates it through the CPAP machine before releasing it into the atmosphere where it can be breathed in by the CPAP users.

SoClean’s business is so that its customers have breathing problems. They are currently receiving medical treatment through CPAP therapy. Odom stated in the complaint that CPAP users are so worried about their health, that they use a CPAP machine to get sleep every night and wear a CPAP mask. “CPAP users would be concerned about the SoClean devices generating dangerous levels of toxic gas. This gas is then pumped into their bedrooms and material to their buying decision.”

Odom is seeking damages to a national class of SoClean CPAP users. This indicates that the manufacturer’s false representations deceived and harmed individuals.

This case is one of a growing array of SoClean lawsuits asking for class action status following massive Philips CPAP machine recalls last year. These recalls affected millions of sleep apnea devices with a polyester-based, polyethylene sound abatement foam, which has been shown to degrade and break down, releasing harmful particles directly into the users’ airways.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/soclean-cpap-cleaning-device-lawsuit-claims-false-statements/
via IFTTT

Questions To Ask Before Hiring a Workers Comp Lawyer

If you’re thinking of hiring a workers comp attorney, you’ve come to the right place. In this article, we’ll go over Common Circumstances When Hiring a Workers Comp Lawyer is Required, the Benefits of Hiring a Workers Comp Lawyer, and the Cost of Hiring a Workers Compensation Lawyer. After reading these tips, you’ll be able to decide if a workers comp lawyer is right for you.

Questions to ask before hiring a workers’ comp lawyer

While there are many different types of workers’ compensation lawyers in the market, some of them may overlap with each other. While you should not base your choice on the website alone, you can get a sense of a lawyer’s level of experience, knowledge, and professionalism by reviewing their profile on the internet. Once you have narrowed down your choices, contact each firm for a free consultation. Most will offer this. During the consultation, you can ask your attorney a series of questions, including your own case’s specific details.

Worker’s compensation is an insurance program that provides compensation for injuries caused at work. However, to file for compensation, you must give notice within 90 days and must initiate the claim within two years of the injury. The notice of injury can be verbal or written, and you must document any employer denial of your claim with Form WC-117. The compensation amount will be based on the number of future medical treatments and the severity of your injuries.

Common circumstances that require a workers’ comp lawyer

There are several common circumstances that require a workers’ compensation lawyer. Injuries at work are not always immediately obvious and you may need to receive medical treatment in order to get back to work. Getting a workers’ compensation lawyer can help you understand your rights and determine if you qualify for compensation. You should have time to recover before returning to work and should not face financial hardship if you need to take time off to recover.

Not all injuries that occur at work are compensable, however. In some cases, injuries that are deliberately caused by a claimant can be used against him or her, which could lead to a fight and fraudulent claims. Workplace injuries must be directly related to the job and must have a causal relationship. For example, a factory worker may sustain a scrape on his finger and neglect to properly care for it, causing the injury to become infected. This would be a claim against the manufacturer of the piece of machinery, which may be held liable for the failure.

Benefits of hiring a workers’ comp lawyer

Workers’ compensation insurance companies often hire nurses and adjusters to handle workers compensation claims. Their ultimate goal is to return injured workers to work as quickly as possible. In contrast, a workers’ compensation lawyer’s ultimate goal is to get you back to a fully functional life and maximize your benefits. The following are a few of the benefits of hiring a workers’ comp lawyer. Read on to learn more.

Experienced attorneys can evaluate your case and determine whether you are eligible for any benefits. A workers’ compensation lawyer understands that not all injuries manifest symptoms immediately. They can help you obtain a thorough medical examination and evaluation to ensure you receive the benefits you deserve. With the help of an experienced attorney, you will be able to collect the maximum benefits. Once you have recovered from your injuries, a workers’ compensation lawyer can help you submit a claim and collect the benefits you deserve.

Cost of hiring a workers’ comp lawyer

While many people are put off by the thought of hiring a workers’ compensation attorney, they can’t afford to put off the decision any longer. This is because the fees that these attorneys charge are often between 10 percent and 20 percent of the total award. These fees are paid out of the compensation award, or the employer’s insurance. Other fees that may be involved, such as copying and postage, aren’t included in the attorneys’ fees, and are deducted from the award.

Other costs that may be incurred during the case include court reporters and medical bills. In addition to these costs, attorneys also must file a contract with the State Board of Workers’ Compensation in order to charge more than a certain amount. In these cases, attorneys can ask for reimbursement from the settlement or judgment. For this fee, the attorney must show that the case has progressed and is worth the money. However, if the compensation award isn’t enough, the attorney may request payment of the costs.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/questions-before-hiring-a-workers-comp-lawyer/
via IFTTT

GWG L Bonds Investors Loss Recovery Options

GWG Holdings, Inc., an alternative asset firm, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on April 20, 2022. This left many investors in GWG L Bonds with large gaps in their portfolios. GWG Holdings has been in trouble for some time. This announcement comes at a time when it is already facing serious financial difficulties. It failed to file required annual regulatory filings and owed investors $13.6million towards principal repayments and interest. It has been under scanner by the Security and Exchange Commission since 2020.

Haselkorn & Thibaut is a national law firm that specializes in investment fraud. They have opened a fraud investigation into the sale of GWGL L Bonds to financial advisors and their brokers-dealers. Emerson Equity and Centaurus Financial, Cabot lodge Securities, Aegis Capital and Center Street Securities, International Assets Advisory. NI Advisors. M Stevens Securities.

For a quick and free consultation with a real investment fraud lawyer, call 1-888-614-93556. This will help you understand how GWG’s bankruptcy action affects your individual investment loss recovery options, including possible securities fraud lawsuits or FINRA claims.

GWG L Bonds

GWG L Bonds are not suitable for retail investors who don’t have the necessary knowledge and skills. They are illiquid, risky, and speculative. Brokers may have used misrepresentations or omissions about the risk to sell their products.

SEC initiated the subpoenaing of broker-dealers that had sold these bonds or signed up to sell them in December 2021. This contributed to the low sales volume because many network partners resisted the request after SEC showed interest. GWG has offered an explanation for this, stating that the investigation by SEC led to their firm’s collapse. Their liquidity problems were caused by the suspension of L Bond sales April 2021. This was necessary to address the regulatory issues.

GWG L Bonds’ total sales reached $1.6 billion. InvestmentNews quoted an anonymous investor who wondered if 30% of the investment value could now be realized after GWG’s collapse.

Emerson Equity, LLC was the managing broker of these bonds. The bonds were sold both directly and through a network made up of approximately 145 brokerage firms. Commissions earned on sales were high. This is why many brokerage firms pushed sales to seniors and retirees without regard to regulations and prudence.

GWG L Bonds: Investment Loss Recovery

Haselkorn & Thibaut (InvestmentFraudLawyers.com) has a successful history of supporting investors in junk bonds to file claims and recovery of losses, against some of the biggest firms on Wall Street. Many firms were suspected to have been involved in the sale of these bonds. Our high-yield bond lawyers are currently investigating them.

This list includes, but not limited to Emerson Equity and Centaurus Financial as well as Cabot Lodge Securities and Aegis Capital.

Center Street Securities and NI Advisors have been the subject of arbitration claims by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ( FINRA ). These claims were brought on behalf L bond investors by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ( FINRA ).

If you have lost money as an L Bond investor, we recommend that you contact our lawyers for a private consultation at 1888-902-6872.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/gwg-l-bonds-investors-loss-recovery-options/
via IFTTT

Camp Lejeune Lawsuit For Water Contamination Bill Pending

President Biden may soon be able to sign legislation that would allow more than a million U.S. marines and their families access to Camp LeJeune water contamination lawsuits. These lawsuits concern injuries from drinking or bathing on base water between 1953 and 1987.

The Camp Lejeune Justice Act passed in March at the U.S. House of Representatives. It now looks likely that it will pass through the U.S. Senate. This allows veterans and their families to pursue claims previously barred under the statute of limitations for injuries sustained over decades of prolonged exposure to toxic chemicals.

The bill, if passed, would allow Camp LeJeune plaintiffs to file lawsuits against anyone who was exposed to water at the base for at most 30 days between August 1, 1953 and December 31, 1987. This includes individuals who lived or worked on the base as well as women whose babies were exposed to the water while they were pregnant. The legislation would also prohibit the U.S. government’s ability to assert a qualified immunity defense against the claims.

Between 1953 and 1987, water contamination at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, caused cancers, birth defects and other side effects in U.S. Marines.Examine a Case

Experts believe that more than one million Marines and their families were exposed to toxic chemicals while living on or near the base. This is largely due to chemicals from laundry services and underground storage tanks that escaped into the local water supply.

The water contained toxins that were nearly 4,000 times more than what is safe for human consumption. They have been linked with bladder cancer and breast cancer, as well as lung cancer, leukemia and miscarriages.

Camp LeJeune water contamination is believed to have caused more than 50,000 cases each of breast cancer and bladder cancer, as well as 28,000 cases of bladder cancer and 24,000 cases respectively of renal cancer.

Over the years, at least 850 plaintiffs filed lawsuits against the U.S. government seeking damages of more than $4B in damages for Camp LeJeune water. However, most potential claimants have been denied their claims by the North Carolina statute of limitations and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Both have repeatedly denied veterans and their families access to health care.

Although the bill is supported by both parties, many predict that changes will be needed to pass the Senate. Only 34 Republicans voted in favor of the measure, despite bipartisan support. The bill is supported in the Senate by the majority, if not all of the Democrats and prominent Republicans like Florida Senator Marco Rubio.

Rubio stated in a May 17 press statement that “some members of Congress worry about allowing sick vets and their families to pursue restitution for Camp Lejeune” taking too much money from the federal budget. “To those members I say that this problem was created and must be solved by the government.”

Although there were some hopes that President Biden would sign the bill by Memorial Day 2022 it is not certain if the Senate will pass the bill.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/camp-lejeune-lawsuit-for-water-contamination-bill-pending/
via IFTTT

Southwest Airlines Class Action Lawsuit Filed By Erlich Law Firm

The Erlich Law Firm filed a proposed class action lawsuit against Southwest Airlines over alleged violations of employees’ rights under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act. Southwest employees affected in California and the United States could be eligible for compensation.

Southwest Airlines, a major U.S. and international airline, has been accused of creating a policy that penalizes flight attendants who take family or medical leave. The company employs a points-based disciplinary system. Employees are given points for attendance violations and points for good attendance. According to a complaint in the U.S. District Court for Northern California, some Southwest employees who took FMLA leave were no longer able to have attendance points removed from their records.

After taking FMLA leave after March 1, 2019, Southwest employees who exceed the maximum attendance point may be eligible for compensation. Relief may also be available for employees who were not able to have attendance points removed from the record due to FMLA leave.

“Firing or other retaliating against employees who take protected medical leave for an authorized reason is illegal,” stated Jason Erlich, an employment lawyer in Oakland, California. The company should be held responsible if there is evidence Southwest Airlines committed FMLA violations. A legal action is an option for affected employees. They can seek damages and stop their employer from engaging in illegal acts.

Roreste Refuerzo, the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, began his career as a Southwest Airlines flight attendant in August 2006. In violation of both the FMLA, and California labor laws, he was fired in February 2020. Refuerzo is a proposed nationwide and California subclass of Southwest employees that used FMLA leave but were wrongfully terminated by their employer’s policy.

The court dismissed Southwest’s case on May 12, 2022. Roreste Refuerzo was the plaintiff. The court found that his FMLA leave could be used to support the inference that he “was a negative element in the decision to terminate” him. It also concluded that employees would be less likely than ever to use their FMLA rights as it would increase their likelihood of termination. Also, the court rejected Southwest’s attempts to stop the case from moving forward as part of a class action. The court has yet to rule on the merits or certify a class.

The Erlich Law Firm would like to hear from current and former Southwest Airlines employees that have used FMLA leave since March 2019.

Southwest Airlines employees can contact Erlich Law Firm to discuss their legal rights. Consultation is free. The consultation is free and you are not required to consult a lawyer.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/southwest-airlines-class-action-lawsuit-filed-by-erlich-law-firm/
via IFTTT

Austin Car Crashed Causes Safety Concerns

One person was killed in a car accident in southeast Austin, in the 5700 block East Ben White Blvd. near Comsouth Drive. The accident occurred at around 1:33 a.m. The hospital treated the second victim. The exact cause of the collision is unknown.

Two scooter riders collided in Austin with another vehicle. Both were taken to hospital with potentially life-threatening injuries. At approximately 1:25 AM, the accident occurred at the intersection East Eight Street and San Jacinto Street.

Brooks Schuelke from Austin, a lawyer for car accidents, stated that accidents can happen at any time, anywhere. He is not involved in these types of accidents.

In a flash, a serious crash can occur and in a matter of seconds, there could be serious injuries or even death on the roads. Nobody expects to be in a collision when they leave home.

Drivers expect other drivers to be safe and to drive with care. Schuelke said, “That is not always true.” “We see too many people driving who believe the rules don’t apply to them. People who have been drinking or under the influence of drugs are a common example. These drivers are not concerned with safety first and foremost.

Anyone who has been in an accident with a driver who isn’t following the rules of the road will know how frustrating it can be. There are many things to consider after a crash. Insurance is one issue. Medical bills, lost time at work, and damaged vehicles are just a few of the issues. Although some injured plaintiffs believe they can handle an insurance claim, this is not always a good idea unless they are familiar with the law.

“Insurance adjusters should not be your friend. They are trained to reduce the amount they will have to pay for your car accident claim. Schuelke stated that he has dealt with clients who tried to settle their claims prior to coming to me. Their statements and actions often made it harder for us to do our job.”

The insurance company will often be so focused on denying or reducing a claim that the plaintiff is left in the dark about what actually happened. It is important to speak with an Austin car accident lawyer to discuss your case. Every case is unique. Every injury is unique. Every claim is unique. Every settlement or verdict from the court is unique. One thing is certain: Plaintiffs who seek legal representation for their car accident cases tend to get better and more successful outcomes.

Talk to me if you were in a car accident. Schuelke stated that we will review your case and talk about how to file a claim to receive compensation for your injuries. “My door is always open to you.”

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/austin-car-crashed-causes-safety-concerns/
via IFTTT

Chicago Dump Truck Runs Over Bicyclist

Last year a city dump truck hit and ran over a bicyclist in Chicago’s Northwest Side neighborhood. A 31-year-old woman was cycling northwest on Milwaukee Avenue in Avondale. The truck and the bicycle turned right simultaneously at the busy intersection of Belmont Avenue. The truck ran over the bicyclist and pinned her under the truck.

The truck continued to drag the woman for several more feet before finally stopping. The truck driver (48 years old) didn’t realize what was happening until witnesses started shouting to get his attention. Eric O. Carrasquillo was the driver. He was driving a truck for city maintenance that belonged to the Chicago Department of Transportation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKUyVd6LYy4

Paul Greenberg, a Chicago personal injury lawyer with Briskman Briskman & Greenberg said that the truck and bicycle accidents are a reminder to us all to be more cautious and aware of our surroundings. He is not involved in the case. A truck accident victim may be eligible for compensation. A personal injury lawyer with experience can advise you on the best course of action depending on your case.

In critical condition, the bicyclist was taken to Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center. Witnesses stated that the bicyclist was conscious even after the truck accident. After the truck accident, the truck driver appeared shaken and was taken to Swedish American Hospital.

The police said that no citations or charges were filed against the truck driver. The bicyclist claimed he was in his blind spot when the accident occurred. Side guards were installed on the truck to prevent victims of crashes from being trapped under it.

Residents of Avondale have described the intersection between Milwaukee and Belmont Avenues, as unsafe for pedestrians and drivers due to numerous blind spots. The incident is still under investigation by Chicago police.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/chicago-dump-truck-runs-over-bicyclist/
via IFTTT

Supreme Court Rejects Roundup Appeal

Bayer decided to rest its legal defense strategy and convince the U.S. Supreme Court not to dismiss the lawsuits. The U.S. Supreme Court thwarted Bayer’s efforts to end the litigation this week. The U.S. Solicitor General urged this week’s highest appeals court to reject a Roundup appeals petition. This petition argued that the approval by the EPA of Roundup should preempt any failure to warn claims.

The U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether it will even consider Bayer’s appeal against the Roundup verdict of a federal jury, which was $25 million. Bayer argued that Bayer’s favorable decision, in this case, would prevent others from filing future claims regarding the failure to warn of the connection between Roundup and cancer.

Roundup may increase the risk of non-Hodgkins Lymphoma or other cancers. All Lawsuits Have Been Reviewed.

Bayer told investors that it was possible for the U.S. Supreme Court, if successful on appeal, to review a civil verdict. It is not common for them to accept to consider less than 1 percent of all claims. However, Roundup could be ended by Bayer.

The Supreme Court asked the U.S. The Supreme Court asked the U.S. Solicitor General to give its opinion on whether the Justices should review the Roundup appeal. Bayer responded to the request by announcing that it was suspending Roundup settlement discussions in litigation.

Roundup Supreme Court Appeal could have a widespread impact

Edwin Hardeman brought the appeal. He claimed that he developed non-Hodgkins from having Roundup sprayed around his house for many decades. A federal jury in California ordered Bayer $80,000,000. This amount was later reduced to $25 million by a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The liability finding was not altered.

Bayer filed a petition for a Supreme Court Roundup appeal in August 2021. He argued that Roundup’s warning label had been approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This should protect the company from claims of failure to warn made by Hardeman and others who claim that the warning labels were inadequate. Hardeman’s legal team also challenged some of the expert testimony that was used during the trial.

U.S. On May 10, U.S.

The brief states that although some aspects of EPA-approved labeling may be preemptive to certain state-law requirements in some cases, EPA’s approval for labeling that doesn’t warn about particular chronic risk does not preempt a state law requirement to provide such warnings.

It points out that the Court of Appeals determined that California’s common law was compatible with federal laws that prohibit misbranding of products. The Supreme Court should confirm Bayer’s assertion that California’s inability to require a warning from EPA for Roundup’s approval to be placed on shelves without a cancer warning by the Ninth Circuit.

California, the EPA, Bayer, and Monsanto have fought for years over Roundup’s inclusion on California’s Prop 65 toxic chemical list. Different judges have argued the issue. A federal judge issued a permanent injunction that in 2020 prevented the state’s ability to force Roundup products to bear cancer warning labels.

Bayer also petitioned the Supreme Court to reverse a verdict in another case. This resulted in an $87 million verdict for Alva Pillid and Alberta Pillid, who are both from California, and claim they have developed cancer as a result of years of Roundup usage.

Roundup Settlements while Appeals are pursued

Bayer announced in early 2020 that it would pay billions of dollars in Roundup settlements for approximately 75% of the litigation that was pending. It will also continue to appeal from early jury verdicts which found Bayer withheld information regarding Roundup non-Hodgkins lymphoma risk.

Many of the settlements reported did not materialize and some plaintiffs rejected the offer and chose to pursue their claims through the U.S. courts. A steady stream of lawsuits has been filed as Roundup users are still being diagnosed with non-Hodgkins Lymphoma.

Bayer told investors that if Roundup Supreme Court appeals fail, it will continue with claims administration programs to address future lawsuits.

The company also announced it would remove the active ingredient glyphosate in Roundup products sold to residential customers in the United States by 2023 to reduce its future liability.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/supreme-court-rejects-roundup-appeal/
via IFTTT

Lawyer Successfully Advocates on Behalf of Injured Police Officers

Jason M. Hatfield, P.A. takes great pride in representing injured police officers on the job. Jason has successfully tried four cases for workers’ comp in 2021. Jason recommended that police officers get additional medical treatment than was denied by their workers’ compensation insurer. Each case involved police officers being denied the medical treatment recommended by their doctors. Jason, as an advocate for frontline workers at the Arkansas Workers’ Comp Commission, was able ensure that the injured officers were treated properly following their injuries in the line of duty.

Claimant Police Officer against the City of Bentonville- Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission #H001634

After her lower leg injury during a training session as a police officer, the claimant’s doctors recommended that she receive spinal cord stimulation. After the claimant’s condition had not improved after other procedures, including nerve blocks and weeks-long physical therapy, this medical treatment was recommended. Insurance denied coverage for the additional medical treatment that was recommended. This was based on an opinion from a doctor not affiliated with the claimant’s treating physician. Jason proved that the claimant was entitled to additional medical treatment for her compensable injuries as recommended by her treating doctors.

Claimant Police Officer in v. City of Gentry- Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission #H005187

The claimant was a police officer who sustained a left knee injury during training. After other treatments failed to treat the injury, his treating physician recommended a costly transplant procedure. His condition deteriorated further. The insurance company refused coverage, arguing that the additional medical treatment was neither necessary nor reasonable. Jason successfully represented the police officer. The Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission ruled that the claimant had the right to additional medical care that included the recommended surgery.

Claimant Police Officer against the City of Searcy- Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission #H000818

After being struck by a pick up truck, the claimant sustained multiple injuries while directing traffic as a police officer. The injuries he sustained included lacerations to the spleen and a torn shoulder rotator cuff. He also suffered bruising between his elbows and his shoulder. The claimant still suffered pain and limited movement in his left arm despite receiving extensive physical therapy. The insurance company refused to provide additional medical treatment when the claimant asked to see his doctor again. To get further treatment, the claimant used his personal insurance. He also received injections to relieve the pain. Jason proved that the claimant was entitled for shoulder surgery. Credible evidence proved that the additional medical treatment required was causally related to the work-related injury and reasonable. Additional medical treatment, including surgery, was provided by the Arkansas Municipal League and the city.

Claimant Police Officer against the City of Eureka Springs- Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission #H000818

After a high-speed chase that ended in a collision, the claimant officer sustained injuries. The claimant suffered pain in his left wrist and left knee as well as his shoulder. Initial refusal by the insurance company to cover the claimant’s shoulder injury in workers’ compensation was not acceptable. To pay for treatment for his shoulder injury, the claimant used his insurance. The claimant received physical therapy, imaging and surgery to fix a ruptured tendon at his bicep. Jason was hired by the claimant to help him obtain worker’s comp benefits for his shoulder injury case. Jason was hired by the insurance company to help him obtain worker’s compensation benefits for his shoulder injury claim. The company also paid for his left shoulder surgery and lost wages through temporary total disability benefits (TTD). Jason proved that the insurance company was responsible for attorney fees incurred by them in denying benefits and resulting litigation.

Compensation for Injured Officers

Police officers are more vulnerable to injuries at work because of the dangers involved in their job. This includes physical assaults, routine training, and apprehending suspects. Officers are also often injured in serious motorcycle and car crashes. These injuries include rotator-cuff tears in the shoulder, meniscus tears in the knee, and herniated disks of the back and neck. These injuries can have a devastating impact on law enforcement careers. The Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield takes pride in representing injured officers and providing top-of-the-line medical care to help them return to active duty.

You will need to understand the workers’ compensation system if you are a law enforcement officer and have suffered a serious injury while on duty. This includes lost wages, overtime, issues involving light-duty and medical care as well as medical expenses. Our Arkansas workers’ compensation lawyer can help police officers and state troopers who are injured on the job to understand the benefits they have.

Jason has seen it all. There is the misplaced belief that officers who are injured in the line of duty receive sufficient medical support and benefits for work comp. Unfortunately, this is not always true. As police officers serve and protect, their lives are at risk every day. They should be able to receive the support that they need.

Contact an attorney who specializes in Arkansas Worker’s Comp law

Arkansas workers’ compensation law is a very specialized area of personal injury law. You should work with an attorney who understands workers’ comp law. Jason Hatfield has the legal experience and knowledge to assist with police officer injury work claims in Arkansas. He can help claimants get the benefits they need to help their families deal with the financial and physical hardships associated with these injuries.

Jason Hatfield is determined to minimize the financial and physical impact on officers and their families. He works tirelessly to ensure a positive outcome for those who protect our communities. The Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield (P.A.) Call (479) 361-3575 for a free consultation. Jason takes care of the legal aspects while the officer who was hurt is able to focus on healing.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/lawyer-successfully-advocates-on-behalf-of-injured-police-officers/
via IFTTT

LifeSavers, Starburst and Skittles and Gummies Recalled Due to Metal Strands

After a manufacturing issue caused small metal fragments to get into the packaging and candies, federal health officials announced a recall. This could present a choking and laceration risk for consumers.

On May 13, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), announced the Skittles and Starbursts recall, warning consumers not to eat certain lot of these products due to thin metal fragments.

Officials warn that children could be exposed to metal fragments, which can cause airway blockages, lacerations to their mouths, broken teeth, or bowel protrusions if swallowed.

This recall covers certain STARBURST gummies’ original share sizes 3.5oz, STARBURST gummies’ original peg pack 5.8oz. STARBURST gummies sours share size 3.5oz. LIFESAVERS Gummies five Flavor Pegpack 7.0oz. LIFESAVERS Wild Berries Gummies peg pack 7.0oz. LIFESAVERS Sour Berries Gummies peg packs 7.0oz. LIFESAVERS Wild Berries stand up pouch 12oz.

The recall candy products were manufactured and distributed by a third-party under Mars Wrigley Confectionery US LLC. Customers can view the FDA recall notice linked above for a complete list of the affected products as well as the UPC codes and Item Numbers.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/lifesavers-starburst-and-skittles-and-gummies-recalled-due-to-metal-strands/
via IFTTT

Vets Get New Tech Help With Homes

The Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs (OPA), recently issued a press release about its new Specially Adapted Housing Assistive Technology. These grants will be available for the fiscal year 2022, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs. This grant will help nearly 4.2 million veterans suffering from service-related illnesses and injuries. Many of these veterans need housing assistance to be able to live independently.

Many veterans have to adjust to civilian life after their discharge. Many veterans have a happy future. Others face significant challenges. Some others are faced with extreme difficulties. Medical advancements have helped save a greater number of veterans than in previous generations. However, many servicemen return home with severe disabilities that will require them to change their daily activities.

The Secretary makes grants through 38 CFR SS 36.4412 to help develop assistive technology for housing that is specially adapted. These grants are designed to address the fundamental problems that disabled veterans face every day. The VA encourages technology researchers, developers, and organizations to apply for grants to help improve the quality of life in Veterans’ homes. The grants have already led to new products such as:

A mobile scanner and reader that uses AI to scan text.
Smart guidance creates a safer environment for your bathroom.

Additionally, servicemembers with certain permanent or total service-connected disabilities can apply for the grant to purchase equipment to aid their disabilities. The grants are generally used to assist with modifications to your home and assistive technology. These are some of the most common home modifications and assistive technology:

Alert signalers: These devices are designed to help service personnel with hearing loss. This device will detect smoke, fire, and visitors and alert the user via lights, vibrations, and deafening sounds.

Door peepholes with extended openings: This allows people who have hearing loss to see through the peephole and identify any person approaching their doors.

Flooring modifications: Hearing impaired people rely on vibrations to sense stimuli in the environment. These people may be able to detect beats more easily by changing the floor’s depth.

Motion sensing lights. Dimmer lights can help reduce migraine triggers many people with head injuries feel.

For those with lower-body injuries or amputations, grasping tools can help reduce discomfort.

These technologies are able to assist the thousands of military personnel who need modifications to their homes. This technology is for those with hearing loss, vision impairments, and migraines.

For immediate assistance, veterans benefits lawyers can help those who are interested in finding out how the recent changes could affect their military benefits. Legal Help for Veterans, PLLC is a Michigan-based veteran benefits law firm that focuses exclusively on claims related to service-connected disabilities. The firm can be reached through its website at https://www.legalhelpforveterans.com/.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/vets-get-new-tech-help-with-homes/
via IFTTT

Lorna Donne Class Action Lawsuit Claims No Butter Used

According to a May 11 class action lawsuit in New York Federal Court, Mondelez Global LLC made Lorna Doone shortbread cookies with no butter ingredients.

According to the Lorna Donoone class action lawsuit, shortbread was first invented in Scotland over a hundred years ago. Shortbread’s name comes from its crumbly structure. This is due to a high amount of fat, which inhibits gluten and allows the dough rise.

Shortbread is a baked product that has three main ingredients: sugar (or butter), wheat flour, and butter (or butter). Lorna Doone’s class action lawsuit points out several dictionary definitions for shortbread that all state butter as a primary ingredient.

Lorna Doone Class Action: Shortbread Cookies Expect to Contain Butter

According to Zilphia Howze, shortbread should contain butter. Lorna Doone’s shortbread cookies, however, do not contain butter. According to the class action lawsuit, they instead contain vegetable shortening, which is in the form canola oil or palm oil.

Howze claims that “the result of substituting vegetable oil for butter is that it lacks the nutritional organoleptic, sensory and sensory attributes of shortbread.”

Mondelez claims to have used artificial flavoring in order to create the buttery flavor.

Howze points out the Lorna Doone packaging’s front label, which says the product is a “Shortbread Cookie”, not a Shortbread Flavored Cookie or a Shortbread-Style Cookie. She states that consumers would assume Lorna Doone cookies contain butter, and they would not double-check the ingredients.

Lorna Doone claims that shortbread cookies made with butter may also contain other ingredients, even though it isn’t the sole shortening ingredient.

According to Howze, “Consumers expect shortbread cookies, particularly where the labeling invokes Scottish themes through the Lorna Donone name and plaid packaging, to contain butter.”

She filed the class-action lawsuit on behalf herself and all those who bought Lorna Doone shortbread cookies from New York, Rhode Island and Texas.

The Lorna Donovan class action lawsuit focuses on claims for violations of state consumer protection law, consumer fraud acts and breach of express warranties.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/lorna-donne-class-action-lawsuit-claims-no-butter-used/
via IFTTT

How Much Does a Family Law Attorney Charge?

Before you begin your search for a family law attorney, understand the fees and the type of cases they handle. Some family law lawyers charge hourly fees or require a fixed fee for the entire case. In these cases, it may be possible to work out a payment plan that works for your budget. You can also ask the lawyer about a retainer fee, which is a one-time payment that may be refundable if the costs of your case are less than the retainer. Fee arrangements should be clearly outlined in the representation agreement.

Costs

Family law lawyers can assist families with a wide range of issues, from adoptions to prenuptial agreements. When considering hiring an attorney, many people wonder how much their services will cost. Fortunately, the fees of most family law lawyers are affordable and reasonable. While attorneys may offer payment plans to help with the costs, others will charge an hourly rate for their services. Here’s an overview of how much a family law attorney charges.

Retainers. Some attorneys will require an upfront deposit to begin working. These funds are called retainers and serve an important purpose – to assure the lawyer that they will be paid for their services. Retainers are generally anywhere from $3,500 to $10,000. These funds are held in a trust account until the work is completed. Fortunately, some attorneys offer payment plans that include monthly or yearly payments. A retainer will vary between three and ten percent of the total legal fee.

Education required

There are specific educational requirements for becoming a family law lawyer. Once licensed, a family lawyer can earn a good salary and can even pursue job growth if the job market grows. However, this career path is not for the faint of heart. You will need to dedicate plenty of time and effort to study the field in depth. But the reward is well worth it. Read on to learn more about the education required to become a family law attorney.

After completing your J.D., family law lawyers practice in various courts and assist their clients in custody disputes and spousal support agreements. Although there is no special degree to become a family lawyer, you can choose to specialize in this area by taking relevant courses or completing internships. The field of family law is highly rewarding because it deals with issues that are fundamental to society. A family lawyer will help people deal with painful situations.

Cases handled by family law lawyers

Family law attorneys deal with cases involving marriage, divorce, child custody, and support. In addition to these services, some family law attorneys engage in litigation. Most of their work focuses on family matters, such as drafting custody agreements and prenuptial agreements. However, some practice in a more general area, such as civil litigation. This article will discuss some of the more common family law cases. Here are some of the more common cases that family law attorneys handle.

Family law attorneys assist people through the toughest times in their lives. They use their extensive legal expertise, as well as their extraordinary empathy, to assist clients. Family law attorneys are responsible for addressing issues that are at the core of society. As a result, they must have the compassion and empathy to effectively assist their clients. In many cases, family law attorneys represent both sides of the story, helping the client reach the best possible outcome.

Experience required

If you have an extensive background in divorce, child custody, and other areas of family law, you may be a great fit for a family law attorney position. Experience in litigation, mediation, and persuasion are all vital aspects of this profession. However, if you are new to the field, you may want to consider working for someone who has been practicing family law for at least three years. Experience in these areas is essential, as these positions require significant court appearances.

The family law field can be complex, with issues ranging from international marriages to multiple warring families. In some cases, complex issues arise, such as child custody, financial issues, and the custody of children. Additionally, a family law attorney can be involved in cases involving children who were born using assisted birth techniques or in marriages with gay or lesbian partners. In addition to being a complex field, experience in family law can be highly beneficial for your career.

Resources available to help you find a family law lawyer

There are several resources available to help you find a family law attorney. The American Bar Association offers a Pro Bono Resource Directory. If you’re looking for a family law attorney who provides free services, you may contact your local legal aid office. You can also check with your local bar association for recommendations. Other resources may include social services, religious groups, and philanthropic entities. You can also research family law attorneys in your state online.

You can also search the internet for a family law attorney. Many counties offer family law facilitators. These people are there to answer questions about the process and community resources. Some attorneys may be willing to meet with you over the phone to discuss your case. They may also refer you to other lawyers in the area. These resources can be very useful when you’re looking for a lawyer. You can also consult an attorney for free through a legal referral service.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/how-much-does-a-family-law-attorney-charge/
via IFTTT

What Does a Business Law Attorney Do?

A business law attorney has an important role in protecting the interests of a company. While a company is an entity separate from its owners and employees, business law is a type of litigation. It involves structuring transactions to minimize litigation risk and drafting legal documents. Business law attorneys are experts in antitrust laws and competition issues. The goal of a business law attorney is to protect the interests of a client by identifying illegal practices that could affect a company’s future.

Business law is a separate entity from its owners and employees

While businesses are separate entities from the owners and employees, they are governed by laws that are designed to protect them and their rights. For example, business laws govern contracts between owners and employees. Inadequate agreements can lead to costly lawsuits and dissolved businesses. As such, it is important to understand the laws governing your business. The following are some common examples. Listed below are some of the major areas where business law is important.

In business law, an attorney helps a company avoid legal trouble. He or she can help a business avoid litigation by drafting documents that protect its interests and minimize the risk of future legal problems. Generally, business law attorneys do not represent their clients in court but instead focus on transactional work that minimizes the company’s exposure to lawsuits. This type of attorney is also hired by companies to help prevent litigation before it occurs.

It is a type of litigation

In today’s world, business law is a common area of dispute. Business disputes can be caused by conflicts between partners, a breach of fiduciary duty, and a number of other situations. As a business owner, you must decide whether to file a lawsuit or settle your dispute with another party. This article will explore some of the most common types of business litigation and how to reduce the risk of getting sued.

The most common type of business litigation involves disputes arising out of contracts. Many businesses rely on contracts to govern the operations of their businesses, including the delivery of products. When a business fails to comply with these contracts, the consequences can be devastating. An experienced business litigation attorney can help enforce contracts, and defend a company against allegations of breach of contract. Business law attorneys are the first line of defense when disputes arise between partners.

It involves drafting legal documents

A business lawyer will draft legal documents for clients and make them legally binding. A contract, for example, is like a piece of special law. The document must be legally binding to protect the parties signing it. When it is drafted poorly, it can be unenforceable and lead to disastrous results in breach of contract lawsuits. However, understanding legal contracts and their implications is not as difficult as it may seem. If you’re interested in a career in business law, here’s what you need to know.

A business law attorney can also draft internal agreements between the company and its employees. An operating agreement, for instance, governs ownership and management. While a business owner may be able to handle certain commercial transactions on their own, many businesses need legal advice when the deal is complex or involves industries that are heavily regulated. In these situations, a business lawyer is essential. Fortunately, it’s easy to hire a lawyer to write legal documents.

It involves representing clients in court

A business law lawyer is an attorney specializing in the legal aspects of running a business. These lawyers do not fight in court and are paid as the best lawyers in the field. Business law is intellectually and financially rewarding and involves working with clients to achieve their business goals. Here are some things to keep in mind when looking for a business law attorney. Read on to learn about their background, training, and experience. Then, choose the area of law that suits you best.

A business law attorney handles many different types of cases involving companies and individuals. Some are complex, while others are more straightforward. You may need to hire a business litigation lawyer to fight a dispute between two companies. A business law attorney should be familiar with both types of cases, as well as the laws of the jurisdiction in which you reside. In addition to defending your interests, they can also help you resolve conflicts with employees and other businesses. You may want to hire an attorney who has experience resolving these kinds of conflicts out of court.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/what-does-a-business-law-attorney-do/
via IFTTT

Investors File Lawsuits to Recover Losses From GWG Holdings Bankruptcy

If you’ve been recently paying attention to the news, you’ve likely heard about the GWG Holdings bankruptcy. While this company is best known for selling life settlements and L Bonds, it filed for bankruptcy in 2022. In addition, GWGH has not paid any interest or redeemed any L Bonds as of 2022.

So what can investors do? The short answer is that investors can file lawsuits and FINRA claims.

Matthew Thibaut, Esq., Haselkorn & Thibaut (InvestmentFraudLawyers.com) a nationwide investor rights law firm, commented that it appears that some financial advisors that were marketing GWG Holdings related investments (and GWG L Bonds in particular) were not accurately representing the level of risk associated with these high-yield securities.

Haselkorn & Thibaut has opened up a GWG investor hotline at 1-888-614-9356, and they have experienced attorneys available to provide a fast, free, friendly case evaluation for investors with questions regarding their GWG investments.

Below are some quick points on GWG Holdings and the bankruptcy.

GWGH is a life settlement company

The GWGH is a life settlement company that has been in business for over 10 years. The company has acquired more than $1.7 billion in life insurance benefits. Through life settlements, GWG has paid seniors more than $283 million, which is nearly two-thirds more than the surrender value offered by insurance carriers. The GWGH has been rated “A” by the Better Business Bureau, a rating usually attributed to companies with a long track record of paying policyholders.

GWG Holdings, Inc. is a specialty finance firm and one of the leading purchasers of life insurance policies on the secondary market. In the last five years, GWG Life has paid seniors over $457 million in exchange value. As of September 30, 2017, GWG Holdings had a portfolio worth $1.6 billion in face value of policies. While this number is small compared to some companies, it is indicative of their track record and success.

GWG sold L Bonds

A publicly-traded company, GWG Holdings Inc., specializes in selling life insurance policies and alternative investments. In the January of this year, the company paused the sales of its L Bonds and retained a restructuring advisor to analyze options. GWG had previously failed to pay investors for millions of dollars in L Bonds and subsequently suspended all L Bond sales and redemption requests. This caused significant losses to investors.

L Bonds are high-yield debt instruments used to finance the purchase of life insurance policies in the secondary market. They were highly speculative and illiquid, and investors could only sell them back to GWG Holdings for a redemption fee. While this may sound like a good deal for investors, the risks were not fully disclosed to many investors. Investors need to contact an attorney as soon as possible if they purchased GWG Holdings’ L Bonds.

GWG filed for bankruptcy in 2022

GWG Holdings, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on April 20, 2022. The company announced in a filing that it would not be able to file its Form 10-K for 2019. The reason for the delay was that the independent registered public accounting firm that the company has been working with quit in January. Moreover, the company missed numerous deadlines in the past. So, it was no surprise that it decided to file for bankruptcy.

While the bankruptcy process is not a simple process, there are several ways for investors to recover their losses. For example, investors can file a class action lawsuit against GWG if they feel that they were misled by the firm or sold investments that did not match their needs. Using a legal tool like arbitration is often faster than filing a lawsuit and can result in a more effective resolution.

GWG has not paid interest or redeemed any L Bonds in 2022

Earlier this year, GWG paused sales of its L Bonds. According to a January investor letter, the Board of Directors engaged a restructuring advisor to evaluate the company’s financial obligations. In a previous 8-K filing, the company admitted that it had failed to make millions of dollars in L Bond payments. While the company has not paid interest on its L Bonds in 2022, it has deferred requests for redemption.

Since then, the company has failed to pay any interest or redeem any L Bonds. However, investors can make up for their losses by buying the company’s stock. In addition to that, GWG Holdings has filed a registration statement for a continuous offering of up to 2 million units of L Bonds, with a principal amount of $1,000 per the whole unit. The company intends to use the net proceeds of the sale of the securities to increase its alternative asset exposure and fulfill other obligations. In the meantime, investors are left wondering whether the company will be able to recover from its bankruptcy.

GWG Holdings faces lawsuits from investors

GWGH is facing several lawsuits filed by investors, and its CEO is facing allegations of enrichment. Heppner and other executives are accused of stealing millions of dollars from investors. While PCA shareholders have been quick to defend the company, other investors aren’t so quick to back it up. Heppner’s actions have sparked several class action lawsuits, with some even calling for GWGH’s CEO to be fired.

The lawsuits allege that brokerage firms failed to conduct due diligence on GWG Holdings’ L Bonds and recommended illiquid investments. The brokerage firms, in turn, earned substantial commissions by selling the bonds. When the company issued L Bonds, it initially invested the money in life insurance policies. It later stopped investing in life insurance policies and started investing the money in The Beneficient Company Group, LP, a private company controlled by Heppner.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/how-to-recover-losses-from-gwg-holdings-bankruptcy/
via IFTTT

3 Cases Selected For Elmiron Lawsuits

Three cases have been identified by the U.S. District judge who is responsible for all Elmiron lawsuits. These cases will be ready for a series of “bellwether” jury trials that are scheduled to start in 2023.

The prescription drug Elmiron (pentosan sulfate sodium), is used to treat interstitial cystitis. It is also prescribed for the treatment of painful bladder syndrome. Users often take it for years as there is no cure. Hundreds of lawsuits have now been filed alleging that the drug caused permanent vision problems in some users, including pigmentary maculopathy, a type of retinal damage.

The complaints allege that Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, its subsidiary, provided misleading and false information for decades and failed to warn patients and doctors about the importance of monitoring for vision changes during bladder drug use. This drug is now known for blurred or distorted vision and blindness.

Side effects of Elmiron include vision loss and retina damage, also known as pigmentary maculopathy.

Examine a Case

Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings were established in December 2020 to address common questions of law and facts raised in Elmiron lawsuits. This centralized the litigation before U.S. District Judge Brian R. Martinotti, District of New Jersey, and allows for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.

Judge Martinotti established a “bellwether” process to promote potential Elmiron settlements and to gauge juries’ reactions to evidence and testimony that will repeated throughout the litigation. This process involved a small number of representative claims going through a case-specific discovery and being prepared for an series of three early trial trials . These are expected to start in January 2023. March 2023. May 2023.

Each party chose 10 cases to be served in the Bellwether Discovery Pool. This made a total of twenty. They were each given the task of selecting one case to be tried and each side made recommendations to the Court regarding the third claim.

In order to qualify for a bellwether case, the plaintiff had to have been prescribed Elmiron and taken it on or before November 7, 2021.

Judge Martinotti issued a Court Order (PDF) on May 9 identifying the last three claims to be presented to juries.

Julia, Brian Manning, and were the plaintiffs in the case. The case was filed in May 2021 by Julia (PDF). The lawsuit claims that Julia Manning used Elmiron between 2008 and 2014. She suffered injuries to both her eyes. Like other plaintiffs, the lawsuit shows that Julia Manning and her husband took Elmiron from 2008 to 2014. They were not warned of the serious eye injury risk.

The case in which the defendants were selected was filed by Opal Broussard (PDF). in January 2021. Broussard claims that she has suffered vision loss and macular damage as a result years of Elmiron usage.

Maria Windham (PDF), also from Louisiana, filed the third case. It was chosen by the court and recommended to the defendants. According to her lawsuit, Windham used Elmiron between 2012 and 2014. She then suffered retinal pigmentary changes including macular degeneration.

Although the results of these trial dates are not binding on any other plaintiffs, they can help to gauge the likelihood that juries will respond to evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the litigation.

Elmiron Vision Loss Risks

Although drug manufacturers were aware of reports of vision loss and deterioration in long-term users, warnings about the need to monitor vision for Elmiron side effects did not appear on the label until June 2020.

Regulators informed doctors and users for the first time about the possibility of pigmentary maculopathy due to Elmiron exposure. This has caused users to have difficulty adapting to dark light, spots, or floaters in their vision as well as complete blindness.

Researchers are learning more about the causes of Elmiron’s eye issues. A number of new studies have been published in the last few months. These studies will provide convincing evidence for plaintiffs.

A study published in the medical journal Clinic Ophthalmology identified a distinct signature for Elmiron-related maculopathy. This signature can be identified by multimodal imaging. A month later, a study published in the Current opinion in Ophthalmology found that about one in five long-term Elmiron users may have retinal maculopathy. This led to recommendations for eye doctors to ask about Elmiron exposure in patients who present with undiagnosed retinal pigment change and difficulty adapting in dim or dark light.

It is expected that many thousands of complaints will be filed in the United States as more eye doctors diagnose Elmiron’s retinal injury.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/3-cases-selected-for-elmiron-lawsuits/
via IFTTT

How to Become a Whistleblower

Being a whistleblower means you’re willing to report certain types of wrongdoing. The wrongdoing has to affect the public in some way, and you must report it in the public interest. The law protects whistleblowers, who can raise concerns about past, current, or future incidents. Moreover, you can become a whistleblower at any time and can seek independent legal advice if you’re unsure of what to do.

Protections from retaliation

Whistleblowers may be rewarded for their efforts by receiving back pay, attorneys’ fees, and a clean record. If their actions lead to retaliation, officials may be subject to disciplinary action, fines, or both. Retaliation can take many subtle forms, from giving someone the “cold shoulder” to intentionally failing to provide the resources they need. That’s why it’s important to include role-play scenarios in your whistleblower training program.

In addition to providing protections for whistleblowers, the OSC also protects the identities of those they represent. As a whistleblower, you can report wrongful conduct anonymously. In addition to protecting your identity, whistleblowers may also receive protection from retaliation from the government and their families. Additionally, you may be protected from retaliation if you decide to report a wrongdoing to the media, or to your local parliament. This protection applies to “public interest disclosures” if you believe there are violations of laws and regulations affecting occupational safety. The law also allows the whistleblower 90 days from the time he or she made the initial report.

Rewards for whistleblowers

The Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics has published a working paper refuting some common objections to reward programs for whistleblowers. This paper cites data showing that 83% of whistleblowers reported the matter internally before going to the SEC. Additionally, 90% of False Claims Act claimants first contacted a supervisor before filing the claim. While high reward payouts may initially sound negative, they do serve an important purpose.

Some critics of whistleblower rewards argue that monetary rewards for reporting a wrongdoing crowd out the moral motivations that led the individual to report the activity. These individuals should be acting with a clear sense of moral righteousness and civic duty, not out of self-interest or financial reward. Others have expressed concerns about the cost of administering reward programs, as well as spurious tips. However, many studies have found the opposite.

Requirements to become a whistleblower

To be eligible to become a whistleblower, an individual must provide original information to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This information must result in a successful action by the SEC, which is likely to result in monetary sanctions of at least $1 million. To become an eligible whistleblower, an individual must provide the information to the SEC in the correct format and manner. This process is not for companies.

While it is possible to become a whistleblower if you’re working in a company, you should always be aware of your rights. While reporting wrongdoing, you need to be clear on your purpose. The information should be in the public interest. The government does not always have the resources to investigate wrongdoing. Therefore, a whistleblower’s role is essential to detecting and investigating wrongdoing.

Retaliation against whistleblowers

Retaliation against whistleblowers should be illegal, but it often happens. Federal and state laws protect whistleblowers who report potentially illegal activities to the government. Once an employee reports such violations to the SEC, the company may not take retaliation against him or her into account in any subsequent internal disclosures. The law provides a broad range of enforcement mechanisms to ensure whistleblowers receive justice.

In addition to monetary damages, employers can be penalized for other forms of retaliation, including threatening employees, blackmail, and false rumors. Retaliation is prohibited unless the employer has actually violated the law. The retaliatory actions must be sufficiently blatant and unreasonable for the employee to be able to receive damages. The law also gives employees a right to reinstate their old jobs.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/how-to-become-a-whistleblower/
via IFTTT

How Are Whistleblowers Protected?

You’ve probably worried about your career, peace of mind, financial security, and integrity as a whistleblower. In the past, whistleblowers have uncovered corporate secrets and changed products, brought attention to government overspending, and raised questions about the safety of nuclear power plants. Whistleblower stories regularly make headlines, and their important contributions keep employers honest. Read on to learn more about your protections as a whistleblower.

Protection from retaliation

Whistleblower protection laws are a critical part of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) prohibits employers from retaliating against workers who report safety issues or possible violations of the law. This legislation protects whistleblowers and encourages companies to create a “speak up” culture. Unfortunately, many companies fail to implement these laws.

The University of Michigan has a policy in place to protect whistleblowers. If an employee believes they are being retaliated against for speaking out about a potentially illegal practice, they should contact Human Resources or the Academic Personnel Office. While they cannot pursue legal action against their employers for violating university policies, they can file a grievance if they feel they are a victim of retaliation.

In addition to protecting whistleblowers, whistleblower laws also protect employees who report illegal activities. Specifically, employees cannot be fired for filing a complaint about unsafe work practices or reporting the illegal use of pesticides. Further, whistleblowers cannot be penalized for threatening to disclose their employer with criminal penalties. However, there are exceptions to this rule, as certain types of whistleblower actions are potentially dangerous to national security.

Protection from demotion

While whistleblowers can be punished through termination or a demotion, they are also protected from retaliation, which can range from overt to subtle. For instance, a whistleblower can be written up for reasons that have little or nothing to do with the protected activity, such as revealing a scam or exposing a flaw. This type of retaliation may even lead to future termination. Whistleblowing usually involves subjects such as fraud, theft, and violations of tax laws.

Depending on the law, whistleblowers can also seek damages for retaliation, such as reduction in pay or promotion, intimidation, and wrongful demotion. Depending on the circumstances, workers may be eligible to receive special damages under the Sarbanes Oxley Act if they report violations of the securities law. This protection can range from a demotion to a complete firing. The key to protection under Sarbanes Oxley is to know that you can file a lawsuit against an employer if they take retaliatory action against an employee who reports fraud or misconduct.

Protection from legal action

Under the protection from legal action for the whistleblowers act, employees can report any unethical practice without being subjected to retaliation from their employers. However, they must protect their identities and credibility, as well as prove that the misconduct has caused the employee detriment. The following are some tips to help protect whistleblowers from legal action. You may be interested to read these tips.

The definition of a protected disclosure under whistleblower laws varies depending on the specific statute or body of common law. Whistleblower laws apply to employees of covered companies, including contractors and some privately held businesses. Some examples include SOX, which protects employees of certain publicly traded companies with certain reporting obligations to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Moreover, there are several common-law whistleblower protections for certain workers.

Protection from harassment

While some states provide no protection against harassment, others do. Generally, whistleblowers are protected from retaliation by both federal and state laws. These laws are important for employees who report illegal activities or practices, refuse to remain silent about them, or otherwise make reports of harassment or discrimination. In these cases, whistleblower protection laws may provide the most effective solution to the problem. However, the protection of whistleblowers may not be sufficient. While it can provide some relief, there are still many factors that need to be addressed.

State laws on harassment differ from state to state, so it’s important to know what your rights are before taking any action. Check your employment contract to see whether you have a contractual obligation to participate in the internal whistleblowing system. Also, read your employer’s policies, including the policy handbook. You can also read whistleblower law legal answers to learn more about your state’s laws. These attorneys are experienced in protecting whistleblowers and their rights.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/how-are-whistleblowers-protected/
via IFTTT

How do NSF Fees Work?

If you spend money from your checking account, your bank or credit union might charge you an NSF Fee

According to Investopedia fees and other fees charged to banks can be a source of disagreement between banks, consumers, and banks.

Customers claim that banks deceive customers by charging multiple NSF fees or high fees to cover small overdrafts.

Many people are concerned that banks will take a large part of their income from the most financially vulnerable customers. TD Bank filed a class-action lawsuit claiming that the bank’s NSF fees policies were unfair.

These fees cost banks billions every year. CNBC reports banks received over $30B in overdraft fees by 2020. Consumers paid an average of $329 per month in fees in 2017.

What is the NSF fee?

NSF fees range from $10 to $35. This could lead to higher fees and more arrears.

Fees for electronic purchases or bounced checks are subject to non-sufficient funds fees

NSF Fees Versus Overdraft Fees

NSF fees are different from other fees such as the Overdraft Charges.

Overdraft fees can be applied to purchases that exceed a customer’s account funds. Credit unions are often sued for their allegedly corrupt fee practices.

NSF fee are charged to customers who spend more than their bank account can handle.

NSF Fees and Bounced Checks

In many cases, an NSF fee can be assessed. These charges can be incurred if you purchase more than your credit limit, or write checks that exceed the bank account balance.

Customers may also be charged multiple NSF fees when the bank attempts to resubmit the transaction.

Sometimes checks can bounce if they are processed using different payment schedules. Checks can sometimes bounce when they are processed according to different payment schedules. This happens because your funds may not be sufficient depending on when the check clears.

A person who writes checks to get the money they don’t have may be required by law to pay fees.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/how-do-nsf-fees-work/
via IFTTT

How Do Whistleblowers Get Paid?

There are many ways to get compensated for reporting fraud, and there is a system to help whistleblowers receive this compensation. If you are concerned about your own business, you can work with the SEC, IRS, and Commodity Futures Trading Commission to get compensation for exposing a fraudulent practice. Follow these steps to get the best reward possible. But first, consider who will pay you. Generally, government entities will pay whistleblowers 15 to 30 percent of the amount recovered.

SEC

SEC whistleblowers receive payments to reveal misconduct in securities and financial markets. Last week, the SEC announced it awarded $40 million to four whistleblowers. Typically, the Commission pays whistleblowers 10 to 30 percent of the government recovery when monetary sanctions are over $1 million. In this case, the SEC and another agency jointly awarded the whistleblowers $37 million each. The rewards are significant, and whistleblowers are in a unique position to interpret the evidence and make the correct interpretation of the information.

The SEC whistleblower program has been successful since 2012, awarding more than $735 million to 127 whistleblowers. The average award is $5.7 million. Since then, the SEC has paid out nearly $100 million in awards to whistleblowers, demonstrating the SEC’s commitment to enforcing the securities laws. However, SEC whistleblowers must provide credible tips, in a timely manner, to receive these rewards.

In the past year alone, the SEC received over 52,400 tips from whistleblowers. Since the program launched in 2011, it has led to numerous enforcement actions, resulting in more than $4.8 billion in monetary sanctions for wrongdoers. With that, the SEC Whistleblower Program has been instrumental in exposing significant investment fraud schemes. If you’re interested in becoming an SEC whistleblower, you can learn more about the process and how you can apply.

IRS

IRS whistleblowers get paid when they uncover illegal activity by IRS employees, contractors, or agents. The rewards vary and depend on what kind of information was provided and how useful the information was in prosecuting the case. The more documentation you have, the higher your chances of collecting a reward. However, whistleblowers should be aware that they must provide confidential information. If you do not have this information, you may be eligible for a lesser reward.

In order to receive a reward, an IRS whistleblower must have knowledge of illegal tax practices. Often, the individual will be an employee, an auditor, or an accountant. But federal employees do not qualify. Instead, the person must have obtained the information from his or her job or have been convicted of a tax fraud crime. To qualify for an award, you must have a substantial amount of evidence and be willing to provide accurate information to the IRS.

The IRS offers rewards of up to 30% of the recoveries of tax fraud. To qualify for the reward, you must be an individual taxpayer with at least $200,000 in gross income. The award amounts are smaller for claims made from public sources. And the payment amount may be smaller if the individual taxpayers are foreign nationals. Despite the low rewards, the rewards can add up. And the best part is, these payments are not limited to U.S. citizens. Foreign citizens often make up a significant portion of IRS Whistleblower submissions.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

A recent award of nearly $200 million to a whistleblower by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission was made possible by the whistleblower’s credible information. The whistleblower’s information was used to open investigations that led to a successful enforcement action. The whistleblower also helped CFTC secure two related enforcement actions from foreign regulators. The payout for whistleblowers is an incredible example of the value of reporting a breach of government regulations.

In order to claim payment for a whistleblower’s tip, an individual must submit a completed Form TCR to the CFTC. The form can be submitted electronically on the CFTC’s website, mailed, or submitted through an online portal. The Form TCR should be as detailed as possible and include all documentary evidence, if applicable. If the whistleblower is anonymous, an attorney must file the claim. The attorney must obtain proof of identity.

The SEC’s whistleblower program has been phenomenally successful. Whistleblowers have received almost $5 billion in monetary sanctions in recent enforcement actions. Almost $1.3 billion of these monies was returned to investors as a result of whistleblowers’ efforts. In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act established the SEC and CFTC whistleblower programs. In addition to offering whistleblowers confidentiality, the Act also allows whistleblowers to claim double back pay and litigation costs.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/how-do-whistleblowers-get-paid/
via IFTTT

Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

After rejecting an earlier request to consolidate the litigation in 2020, this is the second time that the panel will decide whether to create a Covidien mesh lawsuit MDL.

The U.S. The U.S.

A request to create a Covidien Mesh MSDL in June 2020 was rejected by the panel. The panel found that there were not enough cases to warrant formal pretrial proceedings in federal courts. The manufacturer says that the number of claims is “increasingly ballooning”, with at most 73 lawsuits pending in seven U.S. District Courts.

Each of the Covidien hernia-mesh lawsuits raises similar questions of fact or law. The manufacturer asked that the litigation be centralized in front of one U.S. district judge to prevent duplicative discovery of common issues in claims, avoid conflicting pretrial rulings, and increase judicial efficiency.

Review of cases involving different types of hernia repair products.Examine a Case

Covidien, filed a renewed motion to the U.S. JPML in February calling for consolidation of hernia-mesh cases. It indicated that it was unable in 2020 to disclose that tolling agreements had been in place with over 6,000 claimants. The parties agreed to delay filing lawsuits and to try to negotiate hernia-mesh settlements. According to the company, there are a lot of complaints being filed in federal and state courts across the country as tolling agreements expire.

Complex product liability litigation is where many claims are filed in federal court by people who have suffered similar injuries from the same or similar products. It is common for federal courts to centralize pretrial proceedings.

Covidien asks that all hernia mesh cases pending or brought forward in the future through federal courts be transferred to the U.S. District Court of the District of Massachusetts. All but six cases are being pursued.

The JPML published a Notice Of Hearing Session (PDF) April 14 in which it announced that oral arguments will be heard on the creation of a Covidien mesh multidistrict litigation on May 26 at the Joseph F. Weis Jr. U.S. Pittsburgh Courthouse, Pennsylvania.

At least three additional hernia-mesh MDLs have been established for claims involving polyethylene products. These include more than 15,400 Bard hernia lawsuits centralized within the Southern District of Ohio and 3,600 Ethicon Ethicon Physiomesh lawsuits located in the Northern District of Georgia. There are also 3,251 Atrium Claims C-Qur lawsuits located in the District of New Hampshire.

If the Covidien Mesh lawsuits are approved for consolidation, it is likely that the U.S. District judge will choose a few representative cases to be tried early. This is to gauge how juries might respond to evidence concerning the alleged design flaws in products such as Covidien Parietex and Covidien Symbotex.

Although the bellwether trials’ outcomes will not be binding upon other plaintiffs, it may drive them to settlements that would eliminate the need for hundreds more individual trials.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/covidien-hernia-mesh-lawsuit/
via IFTTT

Episcopal Church Lawsuit Faces Discovery Challenges

The Episcopal church’s attorneys are trying to stop third-party depositions in civil cases involving allegations of perjury and spoliation and abuse of process by Robert H. Malm, an Episcopal priest. Malm was previously rector at Grace Episcopal Church, Alexandria Virginia.

Pro se plaintiff Eric J. Bonetti and retired attorney Eric J. Bonetti filed the case in Alexandria Virginia General District Court seeking damages from Malm for allegedly:

• Filing frivolous legal actions against Bonetti.
• Perjury was allegedly committed multiple times in previous litigation. This included falsely claiming Bonetti’s mother, who was then terminally ill, had called Malm repeatedly to schedule appointments.
• Refusing obedience to an order to compel.
• Repeatedly lying during discovery.
• Having repeatedly filed false and malicious police reports, claiming Bonetti had threatened Malm, Bonetti was mentally ill, etc.

Bonetti sought to depose several people involved in the discovery process, including:

• Patti Culbreth is the head of Grace Episcopal School and Malm identified her as a source for information on the matter, despite not having met Bonetti.
• Anne Turner, the current rector, is believed to have discussed this matter with Malm and other church vestry members.
• Bishop Susan Goff, also known as Suffragan Susan Goff is responsible for overseeing Malm under church canons.
• Kelly Gable sent Malm an email alleging that Bonetti had stolen money from a former employer. The email was sent along with 14 others and was not included in discovery during the initial litigation. Malm forwarded it to Bishop Shannon Johnston along with fabrications regarding Bonetti’s time in the church. Gable also failed to follow a prior agreement to respond to questions in lieu de a deposition.
• Lisa Medley, a former senior warden, believes that Bonetti has posted several defamatory statements online under one or multiple pseudonyms. These statements are very similar to Malm’s defamation.

Matthew J. Youssef is a partner in Niles Barton’s firm. He has attempted to stiff-arm discovery by claiming that he doesn’t believe they are relevant to Malm’s claim.

Bonetti says, “In light the fact that Malm’s own attorney introduced Ms Gable’s email into evidence,” Bonetti said. “This includes the reasons it wasn’t produced during the initial litigation.

Bonetti says, “It is deeply ironic that The Episcopal Church claims it respects the dignity of all human beings, but it continues to defend what i submit is egregious sexual abuse.” This is not happening in a vacuum. I have tried to contact every bishop of my denomination regarding this matter, but was ignored. I have not received any explanations from the church about why they think it is OK to ignore church canons that expressly prohibit clergy from engaging in conduct that involves ‘dishonesty’, fraud or deceit, as well as to conduct unbecoming.

“Thus it is ironic that even though the church has completed six weeks of Lent (a time of reflection and repentance), it has not repented of anything.

“The church has not yet explained why it is trying to prevent discovery if there is nothing to hide. If its hands are clean, then why wouldn’t it welcome the chance to prove that this is true?

The Church Pension Group, the church’s captive insurance carrier, is paying for Malm’s defense as well as that of third-party deponents. Wayne Cyron, an Alexandria attorney, represents Malm. He is accused of making various fabrications to the courts. For example, claiming that Bonetti posted online under the names and siblings of Bonetti.

Brian Bonetti, Bonetti’s only sibling, passed away many years ago.

Bonetti had previously offered mediation, but the denomination declined it.

Bonetti, a retired lawyer and one of the first heterosexual couples to marry in The Episcopal Church, is also a former attorney. Mike and he have left the Episcopal Church due to Malm’s misconduct, and the church’s refusal of honoring its canons on clergy discipline.

Malm, who was a rector at Grace Episcopal Alexandria, retired in 2019. He is currently interim rector at Saint Peter’s Episcopal Church-on-the-Canal Buzzards Bay MA. This declining church can no longer afford a full-time rector.

Media contact:

Eric J. Bonetti
202-650-0942
eric.bonetti@protonmail.com

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/episcopal-church-lawsuit-faces-discovery-challenges/
via IFTTT

Perez Mayoral Fights Renters’ Rights in Miami-Dade County

Perez Mayoral (PA) announced today that it’s working to ensure that tenants in Miami-Dade County stay in their homes. Tenants are being squeezed by landlords who want to make more money by increasing their rent, as inflation is at an all-time high of 40 years.

The ordinance was enacted by the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners to protect renters. The new law, which took effect March 25, 2022, requires that landlords give at least 60 days of written notice to residential tenants when:

• Rent increases greater than 5 percent
• Cancellation of a month-to month residential rental agreement

The notice requirement allows tenants to have some breathing space, but it is not guaranteed that they will avoid eviction. We are committed to helping our clients remain in their homes longer by enforcing this new law.

We can assist you if your landlord has decided to terminate your monthly rental agreement or if your rental rate is increasing suddenly.

We are a trusted business, realty, and litigation firm serving Miami-Dade. Our track record has proven that we can successfully resolve landlord-tenant disputes. We know how to balance the playing field, even though landlords are unfairly advantaged. Get in touch with our office to find out how we can help prevent eviction.

Contact:

Perez Mayoral, P.A.
999 Ponce De Leon Blvd
Suite 705
Coral Gables, FL 33134
Phone: 1.866.720.3792

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/perez-mayoral-fights-renters-rights-in-miami-dade-county/
via IFTTT

TX Vehicle Accidents Rise

Texas was once the country’s leader in traffic fatalities. Texas, the Lone Star State, is still a leader in the dubious pursuit to be first again. 2021 was the state’s second-most fatal year. 4480 people were killed on Texas roads alone.

TxDOT states that speeding and passengers not wearing a belt are the main causes of accidents-related deaths. TxDOT estimates that more than 2,700 lives could have been saved if people wore a seatbelt and stayed away from driving at high speeds. Brooks Schuelke from Austin, a car accident lawyer, said, “It’s a simple thing that you can do.”

Everyone is concerned by the sharp rise in accidents. The Texas Transportation Commissioner noted that “…different driving decisions could have saved seven lives per day.

Many people believe that crashes happen only on major highways. However, statistics show that 82% of all reported deaths resulted from single-vehicle collisions on narrower back roads. TxDOT hopes to decrease the number of deaths by 2050. Schuelke stated that while this is a worthy goal, it can only be achieved by the public cooperating. Many drivers feel that the rules don’t apply to them.

An accident in a car can cause serious and life-threatening injuries, such as:

* Spinal Cord Injuries
* Traumatic brain injuries
* Foot and Ankle Injuries
* Wrist, Hand, and wrist injuries
* PTSD
* Concussions
* Broken Bones
* Airbag Injuries
* Burns, Lacerations, and Scarring
* Neck Trauma
* Back Trauma
* Paralysis – Partially or Complete
* Death
* Internal Injuries
* Organ Damage
* Whiplash
* Facial Disfigurement
* Amputations
* Crush Injuries
* Fractured Bones
* Knee Injuries

People must take responsibility for their actions and those of others. The roads will become safer and more people will be able to drive safely. Protecting each other is the right thing to do. Accidents caused by negligent drivers continue taking lives until that lesson is learned.

Safety rules for driving are not only for a few people. These rules are intended to protect all citizens, not just the drivers. Car accidents are not one single dangerous event. It can cause serious injuries and death to many people, affecting many others.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/tx-vehicle-accidents-rise/
via IFTTT

Is Whistleblowing Ethical?

When it comes to corporate misconduct, whistleblowers are regularly rewarded with headline-grabbing payouts. For example, the recent $3 billion qui tam settlement with GlaxoSmithKline means the whistleblower stands to make hundreds of millions of dollars from a relator’s share. But many private-sector employers are wary of such big rewards because they fear that they may entice employees to go to the government instead of reporting wrongdoing. A high-profile whistleblower could cost the company billions of dollars in lawsuits.

Ethics of whistleblowing

As an employee, you might be tempted to speak up about a blatant violation of your employer’s rules and policies. However, you might be hesitant because of a dilemma surrounding the ethics of whistleblowing. While you want to protect your employer and the interests of your family, the morals of the situation trump your loyalty to the company. You might also be concerned about the impact of speaking up on the company’s finances or your job security. Fortunately, whistleblowing can be done without compromising your morals.

The Deontic view views whistleblowing as a fundamental organizational duty. To discharge this duty, organizations must establish secure internal and external reporting mechanisms that protect whistleblowers. A dedicated authority may also be set up to provide legal advice to whistleblower initiatives. These are just a few of the many complexities that surround the ethics of whistleblowing. To help you choose the right course, consider the following:

When does it become appropriate to disclose information? When secrecy threatens the political legitimacy of an organization, whistleblowing may be an appropriate response. In addition, it may be necessary to disclose information to remedy a significant informational deficit. For example, the Pentagon Papers exposed U.S. war crimes committed during the Vietnam War. Likewise, Chelsea Manning’s leaks exposed a graphic video of a U.S. Apache helicopter airstrike on unarmed civilians in Baghdad.

Protection of whistleblowers from retaliation

Retaliation is a form of employee reprisal that can range from firing an employee to stripping them of their responsibilities. It can also take the form of harassment from co-workers, including physical attacks. It is unethical to allow employees to circumvent the proper channels to report misconduct, because such actions can hurt the organization’s reputation. Worse, whistleblowers may be forced to sue their employers.

Companies must have a code of ethics in place that prohibits retaliation. This code should serve as the cornerstone of an ethics culture at the company. Employees must be trained on the company’s ethics code. Knowledgeable employees are more likely to make sound decisions. A company must also develop a policy on how to handle adverse employment actions, such as warnings or suspensions, which may be construed as retaliation. It should involve human resources and require supporting documentation.

In order to qualify as a whistleblower, you must report the misconduct to the Ethics Office. You must report it in good faith within six years of the occurrence. If you are unable to make a report within this timeframe, you can appeal to the Inspector General. An Inspector General can convene a review panel of three inspectors general. This panel has limited authority to make recommendations to the head of the original agency.

Costs of whistleblowing

The costs of whistleblowing are high, especially when it is about leaving a job and facing reprisal. The time required for such disclosures takes away from the individual’s social life, and the stress can sap one’s strength to continue fighting for the cause. The lack of legal protections for whistleblowers has also made them vulnerable to these financial burdens, and there are gaps in their security, too. The impact on society is further exacerbated by unemployment, which makes it much harder for individuals to support themselves.

While many individuals do not consider the financial costs of whistleblowing a significant factor in their decision to become a whistleblower, these expenses are significant. Not only can they result in court cases and fines from regulators, but whistleblowers have also suffered personal damage and lowered morale. The negative practices they expose could have become even more detrimental if they had been ignored. However, whistleblowing does contribute to corporate cultures and helps them deal with internal and external situations in a more effective and positive way.

However, the financial and emotional tolls of becoming a whistleblower are often less than the benefits of gaining public sympathy for your cause. Whistleblower reward programs may be a great way to make an impact, but they cannot cover every conceivable ill. For example, a tailor in New York City pleaded guilty to a decade-long scheme to avoid state sales taxes. In exchange for the guilty plea, he agreed to pay $5.5 million in back taxes. Likewise, a dermatologist in Florida settled with the state of Florida over illegal kickbacks. The pathologist who brought these allegations is slated to receive $4 million of the settlement.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/is-whistleblowing-ethical/
via IFTTT