SoClean CPAP Cleaning Device Lawsuit Claims False Statements

A lawsuit alleges that SoClean CPAP cleaners were sold to consumers with misleading and false information about their safety. This led them to buy the devices without realizing they were exposing themselves to high levels of potentially harmful ozone gas.

Chris Odom filed the lawsuit (PDF) earlier in the month at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. He sought class action status to pursue claims for himself and other SoClean CPAP cleaners’ purchasers.

SoClean is a safe and effective way to sterilize and disinfect CPAP machines. This product is used by people with sleep apnea. SoClean does not use enough ozone gas to clean CPAP machines. This could pose serious health problems for users.

SOCLEAN DEVICE LAWSUIT

Have you or a loved one suffered from respiratory problems or other issues that could have been caused by a SoClean CPAP cleaner device?

Odom claims that SoClean’s manufacturers failed to warn him or other consumers that it used ozone gas. This is a result of intentionally misleading marketing statements that called the ozone emitted from the machines “activated oxygen.”

SoClean 2 CPAP Sanitizing Machine, SoClean 2 Go CPAP Sanitizing Machine and their predecessors have been misleadingly marketed by SoClean. Odom’s lawsuit claims that the SoClean devices use ozone to sterilize and disinfect CPAP machines. Ozone must be in a concentration that is safe for animals and people to use as a germicide.

Odom points out that SoClean has aired thousands of commercials in different media markets over the years, claiming its devices use “no harsh chemicals” since it began marketing them in 2018. Odom points out that SoClean has aired commercials thousands of times in different media markets claiming its devices use “no harsh chemicals” since it first began marketing the devices in 2018.

The company was also accused of lying about SoClean’s devices being closed-loop systems that prevent “activated oxygen” from escaping. This is contrary to what the lawsuit alleges. Although a closed-loop system shouldn’t allow ozone to escape, SoClean circulates it through the CPAP machine before releasing it into the atmosphere where it can be breathed in by the CPAP users.

SoClean’s business is so that its customers have breathing problems. They are currently receiving medical treatment through CPAP therapy. Odom stated in the complaint that CPAP users are so worried about their health, that they use a CPAP machine to get sleep every night and wear a CPAP mask. “CPAP users would be concerned about the SoClean devices generating dangerous levels of toxic gas. This gas is then pumped into their bedrooms and material to their buying decision.”

Odom is seeking damages to a national class of SoClean CPAP users. This indicates that the manufacturer’s false representations deceived and harmed individuals.

This case is one of a growing array of SoClean lawsuits asking for class action status following massive Philips CPAP machine recalls last year. These recalls affected millions of sleep apnea devices with a polyester-based, polyethylene sound abatement foam, which has been shown to degrade and break down, releasing harmful particles directly into the users’ airways.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/soclean-cpap-cleaning-device-lawsuit-claims-false-statements/
via IFTTT

Questions To Ask Before Hiring a Workers Comp Lawyer

If you’re thinking of hiring a workers comp attorney, you’ve come to the right place. In this article, we’ll go over Common Circumstances When Hiring a Workers Comp Lawyer is Required, the Benefits of Hiring a Workers Comp Lawyer, and the Cost of Hiring a Workers Compensation Lawyer. After reading these tips, you’ll be able to decide if a workers comp lawyer is right for you.

Questions to ask before hiring a workers’ comp lawyer

While there are many different types of workers’ compensation lawyers in the market, some of them may overlap with each other. While you should not base your choice on the website alone, you can get a sense of a lawyer’s level of experience, knowledge, and professionalism by reviewing their profile on the internet. Once you have narrowed down your choices, contact each firm for a free consultation. Most will offer this. During the consultation, you can ask your attorney a series of questions, including your own case’s specific details.

Worker’s compensation is an insurance program that provides compensation for injuries caused at work. However, to file for compensation, you must give notice within 90 days and must initiate the claim within two years of the injury. The notice of injury can be verbal or written, and you must document any employer denial of your claim with Form WC-117. The compensation amount will be based on the number of future medical treatments and the severity of your injuries.

Common circumstances that require a workers’ comp lawyer

There are several common circumstances that require a workers’ compensation lawyer. Injuries at work are not always immediately obvious and you may need to receive medical treatment in order to get back to work. Getting a workers’ compensation lawyer can help you understand your rights and determine if you qualify for compensation. You should have time to recover before returning to work and should not face financial hardship if you need to take time off to recover.

Not all injuries that occur at work are compensable, however. In some cases, injuries that are deliberately caused by a claimant can be used against him or her, which could lead to a fight and fraudulent claims. Workplace injuries must be directly related to the job and must have a causal relationship. For example, a factory worker may sustain a scrape on his finger and neglect to properly care for it, causing the injury to become infected. This would be a claim against the manufacturer of the piece of machinery, which may be held liable for the failure.

Benefits of hiring a workers’ comp lawyer

Workers’ compensation insurance companies often hire nurses and adjusters to handle workers compensation claims. Their ultimate goal is to return injured workers to work as quickly as possible. In contrast, a workers’ compensation lawyer’s ultimate goal is to get you back to a fully functional life and maximize your benefits. The following are a few of the benefits of hiring a workers’ comp lawyer. Read on to learn more.

Experienced attorneys can evaluate your case and determine whether you are eligible for any benefits. A workers’ compensation lawyer understands that not all injuries manifest symptoms immediately. They can help you obtain a thorough medical examination and evaluation to ensure you receive the benefits you deserve. With the help of an experienced attorney, you will be able to collect the maximum benefits. Once you have recovered from your injuries, a workers’ compensation lawyer can help you submit a claim and collect the benefits you deserve.

Cost of hiring a workers’ comp lawyer

While many people are put off by the thought of hiring a workers’ compensation attorney, they can’t afford to put off the decision any longer. This is because the fees that these attorneys charge are often between 10 percent and 20 percent of the total award. These fees are paid out of the compensation award, or the employer’s insurance. Other fees that may be involved, such as copying and postage, aren’t included in the attorneys’ fees, and are deducted from the award.

Other costs that may be incurred during the case include court reporters and medical bills. In addition to these costs, attorneys also must file a contract with the State Board of Workers’ Compensation in order to charge more than a certain amount. In these cases, attorneys can ask for reimbursement from the settlement or judgment. For this fee, the attorney must show that the case has progressed and is worth the money. However, if the compensation award isn’t enough, the attorney may request payment of the costs.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/questions-before-hiring-a-workers-comp-lawyer/
via IFTTT

GWG L Bonds Investors Loss Recovery Options

GWG Holdings, Inc., an alternative asset firm, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on April 20, 2022. This left many investors in GWG L Bonds with large gaps in their portfolios. GWG Holdings has been in trouble for some time. This announcement comes at a time when it is already facing serious financial difficulties. It failed to file required annual regulatory filings and owed investors $13.6million towards principal repayments and interest. It has been under scanner by the Security and Exchange Commission since 2020.

Haselkorn & Thibaut is a national law firm that specializes in investment fraud. They have opened a fraud investigation into the sale of GWGL L Bonds to financial advisors and their brokers-dealers. Emerson Equity and Centaurus Financial, Cabot lodge Securities, Aegis Capital and Center Street Securities, International Assets Advisory. NI Advisors. M Stevens Securities.

For a quick and free consultation with a real investment fraud lawyer, call 1-888-614-93556. This will help you understand how GWG’s bankruptcy action affects your individual investment loss recovery options, including possible securities fraud lawsuits or FINRA claims.

GWG L Bonds

GWG L Bonds are not suitable for retail investors who don’t have the necessary knowledge and skills. They are illiquid, risky, and speculative. Brokers may have used misrepresentations or omissions about the risk to sell their products.

SEC initiated the subpoenaing of broker-dealers that had sold these bonds or signed up to sell them in December 2021. This contributed to the low sales volume because many network partners resisted the request after SEC showed interest. GWG has offered an explanation for this, stating that the investigation by SEC led to their firm’s collapse. Their liquidity problems were caused by the suspension of L Bond sales April 2021. This was necessary to address the regulatory issues.

GWG L Bonds’ total sales reached $1.6 billion. InvestmentNews quoted an anonymous investor who wondered if 30% of the investment value could now be realized after GWG’s collapse.

Emerson Equity, LLC was the managing broker of these bonds. The bonds were sold both directly and through a network made up of approximately 145 brokerage firms. Commissions earned on sales were high. This is why many brokerage firms pushed sales to seniors and retirees without regard to regulations and prudence.

GWG L Bonds: Investment Loss Recovery

Haselkorn & Thibaut (InvestmentFraudLawyers.com) has a successful history of supporting investors in junk bonds to file claims and recovery of losses, against some of the biggest firms on Wall Street. Many firms were suspected to have been involved in the sale of these bonds. Our high-yield bond lawyers are currently investigating them.

This list includes, but not limited to Emerson Equity and Centaurus Financial as well as Cabot Lodge Securities and Aegis Capital.

Center Street Securities and NI Advisors have been the subject of arbitration claims by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ( FINRA ). These claims were brought on behalf L bond investors by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ( FINRA ).

If you have lost money as an L Bond investor, we recommend that you contact our lawyers for a private consultation at 1888-902-6872.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/gwg-l-bonds-investors-loss-recovery-options/
via IFTTT

Camp Lejeune Lawsuit For Water Contamination Bill Pending

President Biden may soon be able to sign legislation that would allow more than a million U.S. marines and their families access to Camp LeJeune water contamination lawsuits. These lawsuits concern injuries from drinking or bathing on base water between 1953 and 1987.

The Camp Lejeune Justice Act passed in March at the U.S. House of Representatives. It now looks likely that it will pass through the U.S. Senate. This allows veterans and their families to pursue claims previously barred under the statute of limitations for injuries sustained over decades of prolonged exposure to toxic chemicals.

The bill, if passed, would allow Camp LeJeune plaintiffs to file lawsuits against anyone who was exposed to water at the base for at most 30 days between August 1, 1953 and December 31, 1987. This includes individuals who lived or worked on the base as well as women whose babies were exposed to the water while they were pregnant. The legislation would also prohibit the U.S. government’s ability to assert a qualified immunity defense against the claims.

Between 1953 and 1987, water contamination at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, caused cancers, birth defects and other side effects in U.S. Marines.Examine a Case

Experts believe that more than one million Marines and their families were exposed to toxic chemicals while living on or near the base. This is largely due to chemicals from laundry services and underground storage tanks that escaped into the local water supply.

The water contained toxins that were nearly 4,000 times more than what is safe for human consumption. They have been linked with bladder cancer and breast cancer, as well as lung cancer, leukemia and miscarriages.

Camp LeJeune water contamination is believed to have caused more than 50,000 cases each of breast cancer and bladder cancer, as well as 28,000 cases of bladder cancer and 24,000 cases respectively of renal cancer.

Over the years, at least 850 plaintiffs filed lawsuits against the U.S. government seeking damages of more than $4B in damages for Camp LeJeune water. However, most potential claimants have been denied their claims by the North Carolina statute of limitations and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Both have repeatedly denied veterans and their families access to health care.

Although the bill is supported by both parties, many predict that changes will be needed to pass the Senate. Only 34 Republicans voted in favor of the measure, despite bipartisan support. The bill is supported in the Senate by the majority, if not all of the Democrats and prominent Republicans like Florida Senator Marco Rubio.

Rubio stated in a May 17 press statement that “some members of Congress worry about allowing sick vets and their families to pursue restitution for Camp Lejeune” taking too much money from the federal budget. “To those members I say that this problem was created and must be solved by the government.”

Although there were some hopes that President Biden would sign the bill by Memorial Day 2022 it is not certain if the Senate will pass the bill.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/camp-lejeune-lawsuit-for-water-contamination-bill-pending/
via IFTTT

Southwest Airlines Class Action Lawsuit Filed By Erlich Law Firm

The Erlich Law Firm filed a proposed class action lawsuit against Southwest Airlines over alleged violations of employees’ rights under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act. Southwest employees affected in California and the United States could be eligible for compensation.

Southwest Airlines, a major U.S. and international airline, has been accused of creating a policy that penalizes flight attendants who take family or medical leave. The company employs a points-based disciplinary system. Employees are given points for attendance violations and points for good attendance. According to a complaint in the U.S. District Court for Northern California, some Southwest employees who took FMLA leave were no longer able to have attendance points removed from their records.

After taking FMLA leave after March 1, 2019, Southwest employees who exceed the maximum attendance point may be eligible for compensation. Relief may also be available for employees who were not able to have attendance points removed from the record due to FMLA leave.

“Firing or other retaliating against employees who take protected medical leave for an authorized reason is illegal,” stated Jason Erlich, an employment lawyer in Oakland, California. The company should be held responsible if there is evidence Southwest Airlines committed FMLA violations. A legal action is an option for affected employees. They can seek damages and stop their employer from engaging in illegal acts.

Roreste Refuerzo, the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, began his career as a Southwest Airlines flight attendant in August 2006. In violation of both the FMLA, and California labor laws, he was fired in February 2020. Refuerzo is a proposed nationwide and California subclass of Southwest employees that used FMLA leave but were wrongfully terminated by their employer’s policy.

The court dismissed Southwest’s case on May 12, 2022. Roreste Refuerzo was the plaintiff. The court found that his FMLA leave could be used to support the inference that he “was a negative element in the decision to terminate” him. It also concluded that employees would be less likely than ever to use their FMLA rights as it would increase their likelihood of termination. Also, the court rejected Southwest’s attempts to stop the case from moving forward as part of a class action. The court has yet to rule on the merits or certify a class.

The Erlich Law Firm would like to hear from current and former Southwest Airlines employees that have used FMLA leave since March 2019.

Southwest Airlines employees can contact Erlich Law Firm to discuss their legal rights. Consultation is free. The consultation is free and you are not required to consult a lawyer.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/southwest-airlines-class-action-lawsuit-filed-by-erlich-law-firm/
via IFTTT

Austin Car Crashed Causes Safety Concerns

One person was killed in a car accident in southeast Austin, in the 5700 block East Ben White Blvd. near Comsouth Drive. The accident occurred at around 1:33 a.m. The hospital treated the second victim. The exact cause of the collision is unknown.

Two scooter riders collided in Austin with another vehicle. Both were taken to hospital with potentially life-threatening injuries. At approximately 1:25 AM, the accident occurred at the intersection East Eight Street and San Jacinto Street.

Brooks Schuelke from Austin, a lawyer for car accidents, stated that accidents can happen at any time, anywhere. He is not involved in these types of accidents.

In a flash, a serious crash can occur and in a matter of seconds, there could be serious injuries or even death on the roads. Nobody expects to be in a collision when they leave home.

Drivers expect other drivers to be safe and to drive with care. Schuelke said, “That is not always true.” “We see too many people driving who believe the rules don’t apply to them. People who have been drinking or under the influence of drugs are a common example. These drivers are not concerned with safety first and foremost.

Anyone who has been in an accident with a driver who isn’t following the rules of the road will know how frustrating it can be. There are many things to consider after a crash. Insurance is one issue. Medical bills, lost time at work, and damaged vehicles are just a few of the issues. Although some injured plaintiffs believe they can handle an insurance claim, this is not always a good idea unless they are familiar with the law.

“Insurance adjusters should not be your friend. They are trained to reduce the amount they will have to pay for your car accident claim. Schuelke stated that he has dealt with clients who tried to settle their claims prior to coming to me. Their statements and actions often made it harder for us to do our job.”

The insurance company will often be so focused on denying or reducing a claim that the plaintiff is left in the dark about what actually happened. It is important to speak with an Austin car accident lawyer to discuss your case. Every case is unique. Every injury is unique. Every claim is unique. Every settlement or verdict from the court is unique. One thing is certain: Plaintiffs who seek legal representation for their car accident cases tend to get better and more successful outcomes.

Talk to me if you were in a car accident. Schuelke stated that we will review your case and talk about how to file a claim to receive compensation for your injuries. “My door is always open to you.”

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/austin-car-crashed-causes-safety-concerns/
via IFTTT

Chicago Dump Truck Runs Over Bicyclist

Last year a city dump truck hit and ran over a bicyclist in Chicago’s Northwest Side neighborhood. A 31-year-old woman was cycling northwest on Milwaukee Avenue in Avondale. The truck and the bicycle turned right simultaneously at the busy intersection of Belmont Avenue. The truck ran over the bicyclist and pinned her under the truck.

The truck continued to drag the woman for several more feet before finally stopping. The truck driver (48 years old) didn’t realize what was happening until witnesses started shouting to get his attention. Eric O. Carrasquillo was the driver. He was driving a truck for city maintenance that belonged to the Chicago Department of Transportation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKUyVd6LYy4

Paul Greenberg, a Chicago personal injury lawyer with Briskman Briskman & Greenberg said that the truck and bicycle accidents are a reminder to us all to be more cautious and aware of our surroundings. He is not involved in the case. A truck accident victim may be eligible for compensation. A personal injury lawyer with experience can advise you on the best course of action depending on your case.

In critical condition, the bicyclist was taken to Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center. Witnesses stated that the bicyclist was conscious even after the truck accident. After the truck accident, the truck driver appeared shaken and was taken to Swedish American Hospital.

The police said that no citations or charges were filed against the truck driver. The bicyclist claimed he was in his blind spot when the accident occurred. Side guards were installed on the truck to prevent victims of crashes from being trapped under it.

Residents of Avondale have described the intersection between Milwaukee and Belmont Avenues, as unsafe for pedestrians and drivers due to numerous blind spots. The incident is still under investigation by Chicago police.

from lawyers.buzz https://lawyers.buzz/chicago-dump-truck-runs-over-bicyclist/
via IFTTT